Turo Uk Contact Number, Kahulugan Ng Sarap, Angel Craft Ideas For Preschool, Jobs Movie Review, Legal Metrology Chennai, Add On Effect Ap Human Geography, Hershey Expiration Date Code, Magic Stainless Steel Cleaner And Polish 24 Oz, Broccoli Microgreens Recipe, Sleep In A Teepee Ontario, " /> Turo Uk Contact Number, Kahulugan Ng Sarap, Angel Craft Ideas For Preschool, Jobs Movie Review, Legal Metrology Chennai, Add On Effect Ap Human Geography, Hershey Expiration Date Code, Magic Stainless Steel Cleaner And Polish 24 Oz, Broccoli Microgreens Recipe, Sleep In A Teepee Ontario, " /> Turo Uk Contact Number, Kahulugan Ng Sarap, Angel Craft Ideas For Preschool, Jobs Movie Review, Legal Metrology Chennai, Add On Effect Ap Human Geography, Hershey Expiration Date Code, Magic Stainless Steel Cleaner And Polish 24 Oz, Broccoli Microgreens Recipe, Sleep In A Teepee Ontario, " /> Turo Uk Contact Number, Kahulugan Ng Sarap, Angel Craft Ideas For Preschool, Jobs Movie Review, Legal Metrology Chennai, Add On Effect Ap Human Geography, Hershey Expiration Date Code, Magic Stainless Steel Cleaner And Polish 24 Oz, Broccoli Microgreens Recipe, Sleep In A Teepee Ontario, " /> Turo Uk Contact Number, Kahulugan Ng Sarap, Angel Craft Ideas For Preschool, Jobs Movie Review, Legal Metrology Chennai, Add On Effect Ap Human Geography, Hershey Expiration Date Code, Magic Stainless Steel Cleaner And Polish 24 Oz, Broccoli Microgreens Recipe, Sleep In A Teepee Ontario, "/>

I always used it without taking a look at their "real world" stats. In fact I would argue they went this path for this reason in the first place, not enough revenue to keep it an honest business. I find the following suggestion by u/TheCrimsonDagger to be a better solution: whenever someone posts a link to userbenchmark (or another similarly biased website), automod would post a comment explaining that userbenchmark is known to have biased testing methodology and shouldn’t be used as a reliable source by itself. It was a great way to just make sure your system was performing as per the spec sheet and not a lemon. Another new comparison where an i5-10600 gets a higher overall score than a 3600 despite being worse on every single test: https://mobile.twitter.com/VideoCardz/status/1250718257931333632, Oh and their response to criticism of their methods was nothing more than insults to the reddit community and playing this off as a smear campaign: https://www.userbenchmark.com/page/about. For actually benchmarking, 3dMark's Time Spy and Fire Strike work pretty well for simulating the loads of gaming. I am using a lenovo y50. Banned From Trusted Subreddits At last, justice was done to UserBenchmark’s toxic behavior in Reddit. (How to switch to the discrete GPU)NVIDIA G-SYNC can cap benchmark fps/score to the monitor's refresh rate. Update, 7/28/29, 11:00 a.m PT: Userbenchmark has seemingly changed course from its previous statements, which have been almost entirely removed from its … That way I avoided most of the bullshit. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Having discussed the issue of UserBenchmark amongst our moderation team, we have decided to ban UserBenchmark from r/hardware. But where else will we get our hot-takes on why a 4C/8T Core i3 is a superior "real world" CPU to the Ryzen 3900X? UserBenchmark has received a significant blow today with the news that it has been banned from a major subreddit. The moderators of r/hardware, which has over 1.1 million members, have made the decision that threads regarding the oft-maligned benchmark have … Quick and reliable information at the fingertips. My vote goes for techspot.com. It is important to access hardware performance in order to if you see any system lag or decay in performance. Many processing steps are fundamentally single threaded, or when scaled so heavily actually get slower (NUMA, lock contention, communication overhead, language overhead, context switches, cache misses, dataset not big enough to benefit from multiple cores, etc). UserBenchmark's freeware benchmarking application tests the … As a result, we don't intend to blanket ban links or references to sites like userbenchmark.com. They have a great site but alas, its run by a 10 IQ guy. Though I haven't found a comprehensive benchmark table, the reviews they have over there are thorough and in-depth. They make in-depth benchmarks and as far as I know they are unbiased. UserBenchmark is a Microsoft Windows PC benchmarking and hardware review website that has been established since 2012 in London, UK. Causes of poor GPU status Laptop Optimus/Switchable graphics drivers can switch to low power integrated graphics e.g. For less gaming and more production work, PugetSystems keeps pretty up to date recommendations. Only for apples to apples comparisons. UserBenchmark Gets Banned From 3 Huge Reddit Groups Userbenchmark has for quite some time now been one of the most convenient benchmarking tools around. All GPUs i have tested are over there. Anyone is welcome to seek the input of our helpful community as they piece together their desktop. Edit: First, a response to some criticism in the comments: You are right, even if their methodology is dishonest, userbenchmark is still very useful when comparing your PC's performance with the same components to check for problems. Discussion about the pros and cons of userbenchmark's methodology is obviously welcome. The problem is that there's no "elsewhere" that have as much user data as them. - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com. Our users Since UserBenchmark routinely declines sponsorship, it has become the target of a smear campaign which intensified following improvements to our CPU effective speed index in July 2019 . As shitty and unprofessional their actions and their response to criticism were, a ban is probably not the right decision and would be too much hassle for the mods. UserBenchmark just got banned on r/hardware and should also be banned here. literally have worse benchmarks vs their competitors. The Rocket Lake engineering sample ran at 4.2 GHz while scoring a single-core score of 179. Anandtech are the first to come to mind. There's also Cinebench r15 for benchmarking (most) cpus with a workstation workload. The XT series of Ryzen CPUs barely outperform their cheaper X and non-X counterparts: 3600, 3600X, 3800X, 3900X.Outside of encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU the Ryzen architecture remains limited by relatively high latency and the associated gaming bottleneck (frame drops). Obviously synthetics are synthetics and always to be taken in context but they should fill any role UB would wouldn't they? The reason? Even if this post doesn't get traction or if the mods disagree and it doesn't get banned, please just refrain from using that website and never consider it a reliable source. Same here but I never look at scores, just spec comparison. Game developers are still trailing behind but they will have to do it if they intend to use the full potential of next-gen consoles, and they will. Intel HD. I like the concept of userbenchmark but it really has gone downhill lately. In 2019 I ran the userbenchmark test using the old version of the program on four of my computers and all of them completed the test with no problems. userbenchmark should emphasize more on Multi-thread performance and not do the opposite. I tried going to the nvidia settings and set manage global settings in 3d settings to high performance nvidia and still doe snot work. Cookies help us deliver our Services. Thanks for the information, I'll go elsewhere in the future! I suspect OP and others here are not programmers and can't back up with evidence that multi-threading is now suddenly easier or standard (it already is) for desktop apps. - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build. The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. The reason? But most programmers that write most programs will start with the latter option. UserBenchmark just got banned from Reddit /r/hardware, /r/intel and has been restricted at /r/AMD https://thinkcomputers.org/userbenc...n=userbenchmark-biased-component-rating-drama UserBenchmark adjusted its ranking system when Ryzen 3000 series CPUs was launched. Open benchmark .org has a good set of data for comparison. A single user doing a single task cannot be so easily distributed. There are user reviews for common parts. Given the widespread issues AMD users are facing with 5000 series GPUs (blue/black screens etc. Today on 6/12/2020, I ran the userbenchmark test using the new version and all four of my computers failed to … Its bananas. Between calling their critics "an army of shills" and picking fights with prominent reviewers, posts involving UserBenchmark aren't producing any discussions of value. https://www.userbenchmark.com/EFps/,,3700X.OC,_,,9600K.OC,_CSGO,2070S,. As u/FrostByte62 put it: "Userbenchmark is a fantic tool to quickly identify your hardware and quickly test if it's performing as expected based on other users findings. Between calling their critics "an army of shills" and picking fights with prominent reviewers, posts involving UserBenchmark aren't producing any discussions of value. They're just generating drama. This can influence the decisions of novice pc builders negatively and should be mentioned here. Anandtech lists like three games and I play none of them, so none of the rankings are even relevant for me. Same. UserBenchmark bans again people who criticize the benchmark or the rating on the website. It is not garanteed that these sources are 100% unbiased, but they do have a good reputation for content quality. Not everyone is aware of how biased their "benchmarks" are and how misleading their scoring is. Nevertheless, they are tailoring the scoring methods to reduce multi-thread weights while giving an advantage to single-core performance. Planning on building a computer but need some advice? UserBenchmark being banned and ridiculed on reddit shows this is the end for them in terms of public recognition. The goal of /r/hardware is a place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion. For example, running multiple Google Chrome tabs while running Microsoft Word at the same time and Spotify playing music in the background would see a benefit where the computer will be able to cope with all those tasks at once before becoming slow. Or if you're split between two different components. Should we ask you to provide certain information by which you can be identified when using this website or should you choose to download and run our software, then you can be assured that it will only be used in accordance with this privacy statement. Another nail was put into their coffin unfortunately by their own doing. Any other devs here that can chime in? It started again with a simple tweet, as a result the UserBenchmark is now blocked in /r/hardware, r/Intel and partially in r/AMD (you get redirected to the official Wiki page).. This can influence the decisions of novice pc builders negatively and should be mentioned here. UserBenchmark is fine if you're just looking for a general comparison. Today, high performance apps already offload what they can to other cores. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions. They also are transpatent with every detail of their testing methodology. Or maybe a better metaphor is only fuji apples to fuji apples. If I understand correctly, their actual benchmark scores are closer to being accurate, right? Update. Allowing it to stay just spreads the misinformation further. I wish there was a good alternative to UB. Gamers nexus is also incredibly fair in the least with what they do and have a site for reading or viewing graphd outside their YouTube channel. Every GPU has a page that lists their specs and a chart comparing relative 1080P performance. Posts linking to, or discussing UserBenchmark, will be removed in the future. Huh, I didn't actually know this, I've been using them for pretty much every comparision. It is much easier to use single threads until performance actually becomes a problem. For quick general performance differences between cards, old and new, I like TechPowerUps GPU specs page. So that single user should not believe that 4x the cores = 4x the performance, or in some cases even a performance increase at all, nor should they believe a highly multi-threaded benchmark represents most programs. Having discussed the issue of UserBenchmark amongst our moderation team, we have decided to ban UserBenchmark from r/hardware. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Anandtech and GamersNexus do a great job. They're also extremely transparent about their testing methodology. Having discussed the issue of UserBenchmark amongst our moderation team, we have decided to ban UserBenchmark from r/hardware. This way, more people are educated than just the silenced OP. Servers solve this by having tons of simultaneous users that can be neatly segregated and distributed between cores. I am trying to test my gpu with userbenchmark but it tests the integrated graphics, not the gtx 960m. For just straight comparisons between newly released cards, I like 3DCenter, they aggregate results from 15-20 reviewers and summarize them like this from the recent 5600XT launch. Yeah their methodology is god awful and biased:https://www.userbenchmark.com/EFps/,,3700X.OC,_,,9600K.OC,_CSGO,2070S,. Among the shady shit they're pulling: something along the lines of the i3 being superior to the 3900x because multithreaded performance is irrelevant. They're just generating drama. Nor is this a new technology (servers have been multi core and socket for over a decade). This … UserBenchmark has received a significant blow today with the news that it has been banned from a major subreddit. I find ComputerBase also trustworthy, and while they do not seem to have a database for a CPU vs CPU style view, they periodically update their CPU comparison section that has some very good modifiable charts with popular CPUs. The prices are updated regulary from known sellers like amazon and newegg. The website and charts work great with Google Translate. Download UserBenchmark. Excellent consistency The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) is just 3.12%. Between calling their critics "an army of shills" and picking fights with prominent reviewers, posts involving UserBenchmark aren't producing any discussions of value. AnandTech benchmark database is great, but difficult to extract information from. Problem is that those running it are terrible. Incompetent "moar core" marketers would sell ice to Elsa. Changed both settings and I am still getting the same issues with Video playback in any format, web or local. UserBenchmark are utter liars, having more than 4 threads available does make a big difference to typical desktop usage. Their measurement for their "Best Value for Money" section only takes into account "effective speed", making it misleading. Having discussed the issue of UserBenchmark amongst our moderation team, we have decided to ban UserBenchmark from r/Intel. UserBenchmark should be banned. Here's a vote for the Gamers Nexus tests. HWU/Techspot (same thing) put out occasional mass gaming comparisons which can be useful. - Identify the strongest components in your PC. As long as you actually look at all the differences and not the overall ranking. Tl;Dr: know when to use Userbenchmark. UserBenchmark just got banned on r/hardware and should also be banned here. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. In order to test the speed of your processor, hard drive, graphics card, SSD and USB flash drive. Instead, AutoModerator will reply with a comment and a link to the wiki explaining why UserBenchmark is not a good source. Userbenchmark has been banned from /r/Intel. Competition will get to them eventually. The reason? Search UserBenchmark on Amazon. UserBenchmark Gets Banned From 3 Huge Reddit Groups Userbenchmark has for quite some time now been one of the most convenient benchmarking tools around. It should not be used for determining which hardware is better to buy, though. They are extremely methodical, and more importantly, unbiased in their testing. Multi-thread computing will be the standard in the near future and software and game developers are already starting to adapt to that. here is a list of alternatives that were mentioned in the comments: Hardware Unboxed https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCI8iQa1hv7oV_Z8D35vVuSg Anandtech https://www.anandtech.com/bench PC-Kombo https://www.pc-kombo.com/us/benchmark Techspot https://www.techspot.com and my personal favorite pcpartpicker.com - it lets you build your own PC from a catalog of practically every piece of hardware on the market, from CPUs and Fans to Monitors and keyboards.

Turo Uk Contact Number, Kahulugan Ng Sarap, Angel Craft Ideas For Preschool, Jobs Movie Review, Legal Metrology Chennai, Add On Effect Ap Human Geography, Hershey Expiration Date Code, Magic Stainless Steel Cleaner And Polish 24 Oz, Broccoli Microgreens Recipe, Sleep In A Teepee Ontario,

| 2021-01-17T12:11:54+00:00 1월 17th, 2021|
language »